Legal Opinion

(PC) Casto v. Newsom

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 16, 2023No. 2:19-cv-02209Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 HERSHEL W. CASTO, Case No. 2:19-cv-02209-KJM-JDP (PC) 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER 13 NEWSOM, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff filed a motion seeking: a ninety-day extension of time to file an opposition to 17 defendants’ motion for summary judgment, sanctions against defense counsel for intervening 18 with his legal mail, reopening of discovery, and the appointment of counsel. ECF No. 57. 19 Plaintiff argues that he needs additional time to respond to defendants’ motion for summary 20 judgment for two…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. City of Pomona v. Sqm North America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Roberts v. McAfee, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Hollyway Cleaners & Laundry Co. v. Central National Insurance Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API