Legal Opinion

In Re Nakoski Ex Rel. Magisterial District 06-3-01

Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania

Decided June 3, 2001No. 4 JD 98PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWEENEY, Judge.

I.INTRODUCTION

The Judicial Conduct Board (Board) filed a Complaint with this Court against District Justice Peter Paul Nakoski, Jr. The Complaint contains five Counts based on allegations that, during a Criminal Law Review class which was given as part of the mandatory Minor Judiciary Continuing Education Recertification Program at Wilson College in Chambersburg, Pennsylvania on October 7, 1997, the instructor, in the course of discussing what constitutes probable cause for a stop and search, asked the class, “It’s not unlawful or illegal to be a black man, is it?” and the…

Also in this document: Per curiam 1; Per curiam 2.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Giaccio v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Commonwealth v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Paul R. Soglin v. Joseph F. Kauffman, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  4. La Rocca TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. In Re Adoption of JJSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re HamiltonCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. In re MarracciniCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. In re HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API