Legal Opinion

Baker v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 15, 1986No. 135-85PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TOM G. DAVIS, Judge.

A jury found appellant guilty of attempted murder and the court assessed ten *894years. The First Court of Appeals (Houston) reversed and remanded for a new trial in a published opinion, holding that the jury’s implied finding that appellant was not insane was so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be manifestly unjust. Baker v. State, 682 S.W.2d 701 (1984). We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review to examine this holding.

Appellant claims that he established the affirmative defense…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Schuessler v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1983
  3. Van Guilder v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
  4. Baker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Meraz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1986
  3. Higginbotham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Garza Gonzalez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
  5. Hill v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API