Legal Opinion

Baylin v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 20, 1993No. 92-586TPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOCK, Judge.

This tax case is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to RCFC 56. In this action, Mr. Jack Baylin, the tax matters partner of the Painters Mill Venture (“plaintiff’ or the “Partnership”),1 has moved for summary judgment seeking readjustment of partnership items as set forth in the Internal Revenue Service’s (“IRS”) notice of Final Partnership Administrative Adjustment (FPAA).2 The plaintiff *250alleges that a portion of the attorney’s fees it incurred in a condemnation proceeding were properly deductible as “ordinary and necessary expenditures” in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. United States v. GilmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Woodward v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jack L. Baylin, Tax Matters Partner, Painters Mill Venture v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API