Legal Opinion

Strickland v. Capital City Mills

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 4, 1906PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Before J. P. Carey, special Judge, Richland, May, 1905. Action by Henry Strickland against Capital -City Mills. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cites: As to duty of master as to obvious dangers in machinery: 55 S. C., 483; 72 S'. C., 346; 72 S. C., 411. Assignment of interest in judgment to secure fee is not privileged communication: 86 Am. Dec., 385; 12 Rick., 89; 14 Pick., 422; 3 Gilm., 308; 36 Cal., 490; 24 Ga., 463; 46 la., 140; 50 Am.. Cen.

Read the full summary

Before J. P. Carey, special Judge, Richland, May, 1905. Action by Henry Strickland against Capital -City Mills. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cites: As to duty of master as to obvious dangers in machinery: 55 S. C., 483; 72 S'. C., 346; 72 S. C., 411. Assignment of interest in judgment to secure fee is not privileged communication: 86 Am. Dec., 385; 12 Rick., 89; 14 Pick., 422; 3 Gilm., 308; 36 Cal., 490; 24 Ga., 463; 46 la., 140; 50 Am.. Cen. Dig., 986; 15 Da. Ann., 330; 3 Johns. Cas., 198; 23 Ency., 2 ed., 53, 62, 67, 74; 1 N. Y. Supp, 867; 54 S. C., 481; 26 S. C., 3701;…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice; Jonejs.

The plaintiff brought this action March 8, 1908, to recover damages for injuries received by himi while working as an employee on a picker machine in defendant’s mills, on November 15, 1901, as the result of defendant’s alleged negligence in providing unsafe machinery without adequate guards over exposed cog wheels, and in not warning plaintiff of the danger of the machine, of which he was ignorant. The defendant, by amended answer, pleaded general denial, assumption of risk and contributory negligence. Plaintiff recovered judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Birkett v. Columbia BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Parker v. KaneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Knobelock v. Germania Savings BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
  4. Rapley v. KlughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1893
  5. Monaghan Bay Co. v. DicksonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Baskerville v. BaskervilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. In Re Martin, Jr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. In Re RichardsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. Wise v. CurdesIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  5. South Carolina State Highway Department v. BookerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API