Legal Opinion

Rose v. Board of Selectmen

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 7, 1994No. 93-P-11PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.

After the defendant Denise Kelley obtained an exclusive shellfish license over certain land in Falmouth, the plaintiffs, who had applied for such a license prior to Kelley’s application, brought this action seeking declaratory relief and review in the nature of certiorari. A judge of the Superior Court, after a trial, made findings of fact and ruled, contrary to the plaintiffs’ contentions, that: (1) the licensing statute, G. L. c. 130, § 57, does not require that the first qualified applicant be granted the license; (2) that the applicable renewal provision, § 58, as in effect prior to St.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Caswell v. Licensing Commission for BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Konstantopoulos v. Town of WhatelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Forsyth School for Dental Hygienists v. Board of Registration in DentistryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  4. Yerardi's Moody Street Restaurant & Lounge, Inc. v. Board of SelectmenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  5. Murray v. Second District Court of Eastern MiddlesexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Augusta Grille, Inc. v. Town of NatickMassachusetts Superior Court · 1999
  2. Methuen Construction Co. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Superior Court · 1998
  3. Registry of Motor Vehicles v. WehryMassachusetts Superior Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API