Rose v. Board of Selectmen
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.
After the defendant Denise Kelley obtained an exclusive shellfish license over certain land in Falmouth, the plaintiffs, who had applied for such a license prior to Kelley’s application, brought this action seeking declaratory relief and review in the nature of certiorari. A judge of the Superior Court, after a trial, made findings of fact and ruled, contrary to the plaintiffs’ contentions, that: (1) the licensing statute, G. L. c. 130, § 57, does not require that the first qualified applicant be granted the license; (2) that the applicable renewal provision, § 58, as in effect prior to St.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Caswell v. Licensing Commission for BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Konstantopoulos v. Town of WhatelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Forsyth School for Dental Hygienists v. Board of Registration in DentistryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Yerardi's Moody Street Restaurant & Lounge, Inc. v. Board of SelectmenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Murray v. Second District Court of Eastern MiddlesexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Augusta Grille, Inc. v. Town of NatickMassachusetts Superior Court · 1999
- Methuen Construction Co. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Superior Court · 1998
- Registry of Motor Vehicles v. WehryMassachusetts Superior Court · 2004