Legal Opinion

Gunn v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 26, 1938No. 19224PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The conviction is for unlawfully passing a forged instrument; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular and properly presented. No complaints of the rulings of the trial court have been presented by bills of exception.

The statement of facts accompanying the record fails to bear the approval of the judge who tried the case. Neither is it signed by counsel for appellant and for the State. The rule is well settled that the statement of facts must be approved by the trial judge in order to be considered by the appellate court. Article 760, C.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bass v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Bryant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Lester v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cheatam v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API