Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Cecil Robinson

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 28, 1977No. 19-4143Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

OAKES, Circuit Judge with whom Judge GURFEIN

concurs (dissenting):

The panel majority opinion sets forth Judge Gurfein’s and my views on the principal issues in this case. 544 F.2d 611 (2d Cir. 1976). I stated there that the case was “exceedingly close” on its facts. Id. at 616. Without evidence that Robinson was in possession of a gun at the time of his arrest (because the trial judge in the exercise of his discretion excluded it), there was a hung jury in the first trial. With such evidence (admitted by another trial judge in the exercise of his discretion), it still took a second Allen…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API