Legal Opinion

Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. Burlingame Coöperative Elevator Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 1930No. 29,507Published

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action .on account for merchandise sold. The principal item on the account, and the only one here in con*732troversy, was for a plow. Defendant answered, in substance, that a named agent and salesman of plaintiff solicited defendant to purchase from plaintiff the plow in question; that defendant was interested in the plow and had a prospective purchaser therefor if the plow would cut a seven-inch furrow six feet in width when pulled by a Fordson tractor; that plaintiff’s agent requested defendant to sign an order for the plow, but…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. International Harvester Co. of America v. NewberryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API