Legal Opinion
Committee to Defend the United States Constitution v. Moon
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 30, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 90-2291PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPORKIN, District Judge.
This ease comes before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action upon which relief may be granted. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Because plaintiff, The Committee to Defend the United States Constitution (“Committee”) has failed to state any cognizable federal claim, the motion is granted with respect to all defendants.1
Background:
On October 4, 1991, the Court conducted a hearing based upon the defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6).…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rose v. BartleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Edmondson & Gallagher v. Alban Towers Tenants Ass'nDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
- COMMITTEE TO DEFEND US CONST. v. MoonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991