Legal Opinion

Leach, D. v. Turzai, M.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 20, 2016No. 61 MAP 2015PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice SAYLOR.

This direct appeal involves a challenge to the regularity of the enactment of Act 192 of 2014. Our disposition centers on the challengers’ contention that the legislation violates the single-subject rule of Article III, Section 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution.

Act 192 began as House Bill 80 (“HB 80”), introduced in January 2013. In its initial form, HB 80 was a two-page bill which added the newly-defined offense of theft of secondary metal — such as copper and aluminum, or wire and cable used by utilities and transportation agencies — to the Crimes Code at…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Pennsylvanians Against Gambling Expansion Fund, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. NeimanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Spahn v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Program Administration Services, Inc. v. Dauphin County General AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Phantom Fireworks Showrooms, LLC v. Tom Wolf, Governor of the Comwlth of PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Commonwealth v. WannerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Washington, Aplts. v. Dept. of Pub. WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Firearm Owners Against Crime v. Lower Merion TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API