Legal Opinion

Boh Bros. Const. Co. v. Perry Heavy Haulers

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 12, 1948No. 12091PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The suit, arising under the Motor Carrier Act of 1935,1 was for damages plaintiff’s ditching machine had sustained while being transported by defendant-appellee.

Instead of declaring generally upon defendant’s obligation as a common carrier of interstate freight with allegations that the machine was in good condition when loaded by the carrier and was in bad condition when delivered by it, plaintiff plead,2 but did not prove, specific acts of negligence. Notwithstanding this specific pleading, however, plaintiff tried its case, and *720the court decided it, as though…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alabama & V. Ry. Co. v. American Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1918
  2. Alabama Great Southern R. v. Morris & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1918
  3. Snowden v. Tremont & G. Ry. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Breazeale v. American Railway Express Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Gehrke v. American Railway Express Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Falls Industries, Inc. v. Consolidated Chemical Industries, Inc., and D. C. Hall Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  2. Helm's Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API