James v. Bridger Valley Water Conservancy District
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Parker
Bridger Valley Water Conservancy District filed a petition, alleging inter alia, that it was duly organized under the law; reciting the proceedings which had been taken from the beginnings; and seeking a decree which would declare valid a contract theretofore entered into between the district and the United States of America, acting through the Secretary of the Interior and pursuant to Federal Reclamation laws. The contract provided for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the Lyman Project with reimbursable costs to be repaid by the district to the United States, the project…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Baylies v. Vanden BoomWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
- Borden v. DaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Mercer v. ThorleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
- Sullivan v. BlakesleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- Holland v. THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS. CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Weber v. Johnston Fuel Liners, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1974
- Beckle v. BeckleWyoming Supreme Court · 1969
- Gerdom v. GerdomWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
- John Meier & Son, Inc. v. Horse Creek Conservation District of Goshen CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Logan v. StannardWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.