Legal Opinion

Alfa International Seafood, Inc. v. Pritzker

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 17, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2017-0031Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge

Before the court is Defendant-Intervenor-Applicants’ (“Applicants”) Motion to Intervene. See Mot. to Intervene, ECF No. 24 [hereinafter Mot. to Intervene]. The Applicants are three environmental groups — Ocea-na, Inc., the Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., and the Center for Biological Diversity — who seek to enter this case to defend against Plaintiffs’ challenge to the Seafood Import Monitoring Program, 81 Fed. Reg. 88,975 (Dec. 9, 2016), otherwise known as the “Seafood Traceability Rule.”

During the telephone…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Joseph Arpaio v. Barack ObamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  5. National Wrestling Coaches Ass'n v. Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API