Legal Opinion
Khan v. New York State Department of Health
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 30, 2001PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrew Iii, J.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this Court pursuant to Public Health Law § 230-c [5]) to review a determination of respondent Administrative Review Board for Professional Medical Conduct which revoked petitioner’s license to practice medicine in New York.
When this matter was last before us, we held that a 1997 Arizona consent agreement should not have been given collateral estoppel effect and, accordingly, modified the determination of respondent Administrative Review Board for Professional Medical Conduct (hereinafter the ARB) and remitted the matter for a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Khan v. New York State Department of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Moss v. ChassinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Spartalis v. State Board for Professional Medical ConductAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Pisnanont v. New York State Board for Professional Medical ConductAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Weg v. DeBuonoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- D'Souza v. New York State Department of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Singh v. New York State Department of Health Board of Professional Medical ConductAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Conteh v. DainesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Hason v. Department of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Orens v. NovelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.