Legal Opinion

Bailey v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 2009No. 49S02-0812-CR-630PublishedCited by 208 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

Christopher Bailey, convicted of battery and disorderly conduct as the result of an early morning confrontation in his high school, has argued on appeal that there is insufficient evidence to support his convictions. The Court of Appeals agreed and reversed both convictions We granted transfer and now affirm on both counts, concluding that the evidence demonstrates Bailey intentionally touched the assistant principal in a rude, insolent, or angry manner and also engaged in tumultuous conduct with the dean of students.

Facts and Procedural History

On the morning of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Henley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. B.R. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Gebhard v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. N.J. ex rel. Jackson v. Metropolitan School District of Washington TownshipIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Bailey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

3Cited by208 opinions

  1. Drakkar R. Willis v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Engelica E. Castillo v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Tin Thang v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Pardip Singh v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Wendy Burnett v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017

203 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API