Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Ackerman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 15, 1995No. 1931760, 1931761Published

1DissentHouston, Justice

An assistant district attorney cannot, by inadvertence, undermine the legislature’s authority to establish sentencing ranges. The defendant has shown no detrimental reliance on the plea agreement and no prejudice that would result from its rescission; therefore, I cannot agree with the majority that the failure to enforce the agreement would violate the defendant’s due process rights. Then Presiding Judge Bowen wrote in the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals: “In any further prosecution of [the defendant], the State may not use any admissions obtained from or volunteered by [the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. AckermanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API