Legal Opinion

Shipman v. Seymour

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1879PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Superior Court of Detroit. Keplevin. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

Plaintiff in error is assignee of the copartnership of Wilson Bros., composed of George B: Wilson and Frank B. Wilson, recently doing business in Detroit. The assignment is a general assignment fór the benefit of creditors, and bears date January 18, 1878. Seymour, the defendant in error, is named in the assignment as one of the creditors of Wilson Bros., and this suit is replevin to recover the possession of certain goods purchased by them of him shortly previous to the assignment, and which he claims were -bought with knowledge'on their part of their insolvency, and with the intention not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nichols v. . MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  2. Donaldson v. FarwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Hall v. . NaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  4. Devoe v. . BrandtNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Thompson v. RoseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1844

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Zucker v. KarpelesMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. People ex rel. Ellis v. HealyIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Putnam v. ReynoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Lee v. SimmonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  5. John L. Roper Lumber Co. v. Richmond Cedar Works & Dismal Swamp Canal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API