Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Merchants Nat. Bank of Mobile

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 17, 1953No. 1 Div. 506PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWSON, Justice.

This appeal is prosecuted from the action of the trial judge in refusing a motion to retax costs, made under § 77, Title 11, Code 1940, which section is intended to afford relief to parties against whom a clerk or other ministerial officef has improperly taxed costs.

Hunt C. Hughes appealed to this court from a judgment of the circuit court of Mobile County upholding the will pf one Flattie T. Hughes. We affirmed. Hughes v. Merchants National Bank of Mobile, 256 Ala. 88, 53 So.2d 386.

The circuit clerk in his cost bill taxed appéllant, Hunt C. Hughes, for iriaking an-*101original…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barker v. ByarsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Hughes v. Merchants Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Foodtown Stores, Inc. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. SH Kress & Company v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. May-Bilt, Inc. v. DeeseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  4. Helen Ruth Vaughn v. National Tea CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
  5. SH Kress & Company v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API