Legal Opinion
Smith v. Astrue
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 5, 2013No. Civ. Action No. 09-422-CJBPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BURKE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Robert Smith (“Smith” or “Plaintiff’) appeals from a decision of Defendant Michael J. Astrue, the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”), denying him application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-434. The Court has jurisdiction over the matter pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Presently pending before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by Smith and the Commissioner. (D.I. 12, 15) Smith asks the Court to reverse the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Burnside v. ColvinDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- ALI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- CAESAR v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- Chris G. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- DAYWALT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.