Legal Opinion
Claim of Staruch v. New York Telephone Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 3, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.
Cross appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed November 28, 2001, which ruled, inter alia, that the employer was not entitled to full reimbursement for certain benefits paid.
This appeal marks the second time this matter has come before this Court (277 AD2d 830 [2000], lv dismissed and denied 96 NY2d 852 [2001] [hereinafter Staruch i]). Staruch I involved an appeal from a determination of the Workers’ Compensation Board filed August 26, 1998, which held that claimant’s employer, New York Telephone Company (hereinafter the company), was entitled to full reimbursement…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Claim of Richardson v. Fiedler Roofing, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Acres Storage Co. v. ChuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Vartanian v. Research Foundation of State UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Inre O'LearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Passaro v. Lake George Park CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mooring v. American AirlinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Claim of Brown v. Verizon New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Meeks v. Verizon New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Claim of Eusebio v. Verizon New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004