Legal Opinion

Grisamore v. Grisamore

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 10, 1939No. 35081PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

Wilbert Grisamore sued his wife for a separation from bed and' board, on the ground that she had abandoned him. In. her answer to the suit, she denied that she had abandoned her husband, and aver-' red that he had abandoned her without just cause; hence she set up a reeonventional' demand for a decree of separation from bed and board, in her favor. She asked for alimony pendente, lite, under article 148 of the Civil Code. On the trial of the rule to show cause why the husband should not pay alimony pendente lite, he proposed to receive his wife, not in the house where…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Arnold v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  2. State ex rel. Huber v. KingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
  3. State ex rel. Hill v. Judge of Civil District CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  4. Holbrook v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
  5. Suberville v. AdamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Messersmith v. MessersmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  2. Eals v. SwanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  3. Hillard v. HillardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  4. Viser v. ViserSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  5. Coney v. ConeySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API