Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Bartelt

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 2011No. 107276Published

1DissentJustice Freeman

This appeal squarely presents the question of whether a police officer’s order to a driver, during a routine traffic stop, to perform a “set-up” procedure to facilitate a canine sniff for narcotics, is an unreasonable seizure which violates the fourth amendment. It is my view that it is. Despite the fact that this precise issue was litigated by the parties in the circuit court, and even though the majority’s own recitation of the factual background and procedural history of this cause repeatedly references seizure principles, my colleagues decline to analyze this appeal in the context of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API