Legal Opinion
Nowell v. Nowell
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided February 13, 1963No. File 118006PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMacDonald, J.
Since the first stated ground of defendant’s plea in abatement to the complaint was abandoned by statement of his counsel in open court, we will turn to the second stated ground, namely, that the writ and complaint were not returned to the court “at least six days before the return day” as required by § 52-47 of our General Statutes.
It appears on the face of the record, and is not controverted, that the writ was served on the defendant on Sunday, December 2, 1962, after sundown (as shown on the officer’s return) and that it was returned to the court on Wednesday, December 26, 1962, at 3:28…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Treat v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Austin, Nichols Co., Inc. v. GilmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Brooklyn Trust Co. v. Town of HebronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883
- Alderman v. Town of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Spencer v. ChampionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1838
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commercial Air Charters, Inc. v. Sundorph Aeronautical Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1972
- Diversified Financial Systems v. Nash, No. Cv93-0242823 (Apr. 29, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
- Dmd Enterprises v. Esquilin, No. Sph 9110-62420 (Dec. 10, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991