Commonwealth v. Woodruff
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
BENDER, P.J.E.:
Appellant, Matthew Woodruff, appeals from the order denying his ex post facto challenge to the imposition of new sexual offender registration and reporting requirements under Pennsylvania’s Sexual Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), 42 Pa.C.S. § 9799.10-9799.41. After careful review, we affirm.
As a result of Appellant’s 2002 conviction for indecent assault against a minor less than 13 years of age, 1 , 2 he was required to register with the Pennsylvania State Police (PSP) for a period of ten years under a prior version of Pennsylvania’s Megan’s Law 3…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Muniz, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. KizakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Com. v. Gruver, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Com. v. Shields, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. Muniz, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.