Jewell v. Jewell
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WASSERSTROM, Judge.
The issue presented here is whether the court below properly ordered a default divorce in favor of the respondent (hereinafter referred to as the “wife”) upon the failure of the appellant (hereinafter referred to as the “husband”) to appear for the taking of his deposition. This is merely the culminating episode in a serial of litigation between these parties. The specif ic circumstances giving rise to the legal problem now at issue cannot be fairly considered except in the context of the mass of controversy which had preceded.
The history of this litigation began in 1963…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Freeman v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Wallace v. McConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- State ex inf. Hadley v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- State ex rel. Sullivan v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of DickeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Simpkins v. Ryder Freight System, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Schulz v. SchulzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- DuPont v. BluesteinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Hayes v. HayesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.