Legal Opinion

Georgia Northern Railway Co. v. Winchester

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 20, 1917No. 7927PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Certiorari; from Colquitt superior court—Judge Thomas. October 13, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.

In this case it is unnecessary to consider whether the adoption by the legislature of the act of 1913 (Acts of 1913, pp. 46, 47), containing the provision that “all dogs are hereby made personal property and shall be given in and taxed,” authorizes a recovery against a railway company for negligently killing or injuring a dog; and in such eases creates a presumption against the company as in eases of injuries to persons or other property; since, under numerous decisions of this court and of the Supreme Court, an action is maintainable against one who wantonly, maliciously, or intentionally…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. KeelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MorelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API