Legal Opinion

Eckles v. Board of Com'rs of Hughes Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 15, 1925No. 15593PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THREADGILL, C.

The question involved in this appeal is the legality of claims and expenditures for the county superintendent of health beyond the amount of the estimate approved by the county excise hoard.

The action was brought by the plaintiff in error, as .plaintiff, against the defendant in error, as defendant, to recover on two itemized accounts, one in the sum of $348.-50 for services and expenses in treating smallpox from March 1, 1921, to February, .1922, and the othe(iJ in the sum of $341 for services and expenses in treating smallpox from February 1, 1922, to February 24,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smart v. Board of County Com'rs of Craig CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Hume v. WyandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Board of Com'rs of Creek County v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Board of Com'rs of Carter County v. DoroughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API