Eckles v. Board of Com'rs of Hughes Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THREADGILL, C.
The question involved in this appeal is the legality of claims and expenditures for the county superintendent of health beyond the amount of the estimate approved by the county excise hoard.
The action was brought by the plaintiff in error, as .plaintiff, against the defendant in error, as defendant, to recover on two itemized accounts, one in the sum of $348.-50 for services and expenses in treating smallpox from March 1, 1921, to February, .1922, and the othe(iJ in the sum of $341 for services and expenses in treating smallpox from February 1, 1922, to February 24,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Smart v. Board of County Com'rs of Craig CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Hume v. WyandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
3Cited by2 opinions
- Board of Com'rs of Creek County v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Board of Com'rs of Carter County v. DoroughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936