City of Benton v. Nethercutt
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Howard, Jr., Justice.
We are to determine whether the trial judge committed reversible error in concluding, in a declaratory judgment proceeding, that the City of Benton’s referendum ordinance, requiring referendum petitions to be filed within 30 days after the passage of an ordinance on which a referendum is sought, is invalid, thus resulting in an order requiring a referendum on ordinances 1, 3, 33, 34, 36, 37, 38 and 39, although the referendum petitions were filed more than 30 days after the passage of the ordinances.
THE FACTS
On December 20, 1977, the Board of Directors of the City…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Van Buren v. TexarkanaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
- Arkadelphia Lumber Co. v. ArkadelphiaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
- Adams v. SimsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Santa Rosa City R. Co. v. Central St. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Lewis v. Forrest City Special Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.