Legal Opinion

Thal v. Polumbaum

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment modified by striking therefrom so much thereof as awards money damages against defendants George Ogens, doing business as Ansonia Sign Company, and Miracle Sell-It Sign Corp. and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. It was proper to grant this injunctive relief against all the defendants, but we see no basis in this record for a money judgment against defendants Ogens and Miracle, since there is nothing to show any connection of either of those defendants with the transaction or transactions involving the 3,565 “ Graybar ” signs. No opinion, intersection, and that such sign had…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Extrin Foods, Inc. v. LeightonNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Planet Manufacturing Corp. v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Miroflector Co. v. KlineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API