Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Field v. Cronshaw

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1988Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ralph Diamond, J.

This appears to be a matter of first impression as to whether a stepfather should be permitted to be an intervenor in a custody/visitation action between both natural parents.

Upon the foregoing papers, it is ordered that the application by Allan Cronshaw, Jr., the respondent’s present husband, for an order permitting him to intervene in the above-captioned action pursuant to CPLR 1012 (a) (2) and the notice of cross motion by the petitioner for an order imposing sanctions against the respondent for vexatious litigation practice are decided as follows:

By…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Friederwitzer v. FriederwitzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People ex rel. Scarpetta v. Spence-Chapin Adoption ServiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. United Baking Co. v. Bakery & Confectionery Workers' Union, Local 221Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  4. MATTER OF CAVAGES, INC. v. KetterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  5. Unitarian Universalist Church v. ShortenNew York Supreme Court · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API