Legal Opinion

Oliner v. Lenox Hill Hospital

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Herman Cahn, J.

Petitioner is the father of a boy born eight days ago. The child was born at respondent hospital, where his mother is still a patient. The mother’s physician, who has spoken to the court over the telephone advises that the mother should not yet be discharged, and should remain a patient at the hospital for one or more days.

Petitioner, his wife and son are Orthodox Jews. Petitioner seeks to have his child circumcised in a manner acceptable to him religiously. This requires that the circumcision be performed on the eighth day (today), and by a religiously…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Zlotowitz v. Jewish HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  2. Zakhartchenko v. WeinbergerNew York Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Y.Y.B. v. RachminovNew York Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API