Legal Opinion

United States v. Wilson

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 1, 2010No. CR 01-263-3-HA, CV 06-527-HAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

REDDEN, Judge:

Before the court is petitioner Jay W. Wilson’s Motion (doc. 285) to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. For the reasons set forth below, I GRANT the motion, and ORDER the government to release petitioner within 30 days.

I. Background

Petitioner’s conviction arose from a conspiracy involving the importation and dis tribution of thousands of pills of methylenedioxymethamphetamine (ecstacy). On August 13, 2001, law enforcement officers arrested petitioner and searched his home and car pursuant to a warrant. They found 116 ecstacy…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019
  2. Amended September 21, 2016 State of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  3. State of Alaska v. Jason Lee CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019
  4. State of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  5. State of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API