Legal Opinion

Maisonneuve v. Dalferes

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 30, 1913No. Nos. 19,857-19,858PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Lafayette; Wm. Campbell, Judge. Two actions, one by Rev. A. Maisonneuve, the other by the Baldwin Lumber Company, Limited, both against M. D. Dalferes. From a dismissal of their suits, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.

These suits have been twice dismissed on exceptions. The first judgments were reversed by this court, and the cases were remanded for further proceedings according to law. See 130 La. 712, 58 South. 519, and 130 La. 714, 58 South. 520. After the cases were remanded, the defendant answered, pleading the general issue. These answers were filed on June 10,1912. On February 3, 1913, defendant filed an exception that the causes of action were inconsistent, and that plaintiffs should be ordered to elect between the possessory and the petitory action. The plaintiffs were ordered to elect, and,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baldwin Lumber Co. v. DelfaresSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  2. Jackson v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859
  3. Lotz v. FolgerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1855
  4. Maisonneuve v. DelfaresSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  5. Stewart v. ScudderSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1855

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baldwin Lumber Co. v. DalferesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  2. Lee Tire & Rubber Co. v. Frederick-Planche Motor Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API