Legal Opinion
United States of America v. Roger Napoleon Grant
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 19, 2026No. 2:25-cv-02394Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 2:25-cv-2394 TLN AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 ROGER NAPOLEAN GRANT, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment, ECF No. 23, was heard before the undersigned on 18 March 18, 2026, via videoconference. Jeremy Hendon appeared for the United States and Roger 19 Grant appeared in pro se. ECF No. 30. For the reasons explained below, the undersigned 20 recommends that the motion be granted and that default judgment be entered for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.