Legal Opinion

Wilson's Estate

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 11, 1915No. Appeal, No. 108PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 108, Oct. T., 1914, by Eber E. Hilton, from decree of O. C. Lancaster Co., April T., 1911, No. 9, directing payment of amount due on legacy in Estate of Margaret A. Wilson, deceased. Rule to pay amount due on legacy. Before Smith, J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was the decree directing payment by the executor.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, J.,

By the final adjudication in the above estate, filed May 20, 1912, the appellees were found to be entitled to certain legacies bequeathed to them by decedent. In the sums apportioned to them interest was included. The interest was calculated from the expiration of a year after the death of the testatrix, and the accounts showed that there were sufficient funds to pay all the legacies. On December 9, 1912, two of the appellees signed a release in which they acknowledged payment in full of all claims they had against the estate. In the release was incorporated at length a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re SouthwickNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
  2. Newlin v. NewlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1815
  3. Deardorff's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1837
  4. Estate of HertzlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  5. Horton's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transp. Auth. v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. Estate of KaminskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API