Legal Opinion

Hickey v. Hickey

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1948PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The elements necessary to establish undue influence in the execution of a will are susceptibility of the testator to influence, the disposition and opportunity to exercise influence, and a result indicating the exercise of undue influence by the person so disposed and so situated. Ball v. Boston (1913), 153 Wis. 27, 141 N W. 8; Will of Nachtsheim (1918), 166 Wis. 556, 164 N. W. 997; Will of Link (1930), 202 Wis. 1, 231 N. W. 177; Will of Schaefer (1932), 207 Wis. 404, 241 N. W. 382; Will of Leisch (1936), 221 Wis. 641, 267 N. W. 268; Will of Stanley (1937), 226 Wis. 354, 276 N. W. 353; Will…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Will of Ball v. BostonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Schaefer v. ZiebellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Stanley v. StanleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Will of Link v. MondayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Bomke v. RaaschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Budge v. HawleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API