Legal Opinion

United States v. Lachney

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 23, 2006No. 04-30490Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM: *

This court affirmed Elander Lachney’s sentence. United States v. Lachney, 119 Fed.Appx. 640 (5th Cir.2005) (per curiam). The Supreme Court vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Lachney v. United States, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 2276, 161 L.Ed.2d 1054 (2005). We requested and received supplemental letter briefs addressing the impact of Booker.

Lachney acknowledges that his challenge under Booker is subject to plain error review because…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. United States v. MaresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API