Lozano v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of .assault with intent to murder without malice one Pablo Benavides; and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.
No bills of exception are brought forward. The sufficiency of the evidence to support a verdict of assault to murder is challenged. This is the only question in the case.
Felipe Anchando, the main State’s witness besides Benavides, figures largely in the transaction. We gather from the evidence that both Anchando and Benavides were friends of appellant. The record reflects that there had been no previous trouble…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Basquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Fregia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Dodd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Bigby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Ammann v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Booker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.