Legal Opinion

Gedratis v. Carroll

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1929No. Docket No. 41, Calendar No. 34,225PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

Defendant Figiey is a police officer and defendant Carroll is superintendent of police in Grand Rapids. On May 5, 1926, Figley saw plaintiff drive his automobile on the left of the center of a street intersection when turning a corner, in violation of a city ordinance. He stopped plaintiff, went to his car, noticed that he was intoxicated, and saw a basket covered by a blanket. The testimony is in dispute as to the conversation then had, Figley claiming plaintiff gave him permission to investigate the basket and plaintiff denying it. Figley examined the basket and found a 2-gallon jug of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Gelston v. HoytSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  4. Dodge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Port Gardner Investment Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Palmer Development Corp. v. GordonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  2. Killian v. FullerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Radzinski v. DoeMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Palmer Development Corp. v. GordonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API