Legal Opinion
Kirk v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided April 5, 1956PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Peewitt
In June, 1955, complainant Mrs. Kirk, filed a bill in the Chancery Court of Maury County, seeking; to recover of the defendant insurance company the sum of $5,000. The bill charged that the company had issued a policy of automobile insurance to Burton Kirk, Mrs. Kirk’s husband, and that while the policy was in force Mrs. Kirk was injured in an automobile wreck.
The bill further charged that at the time of the wreck she was riding in an automobile owned by her husband and covered by this policy, which automobile was- then being driven by Clovis M. Anderson with the consent and permission of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pearson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Munsert v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. GeistMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by9 opinions
- Great American Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- John Tenopir v. State Farm Mutual Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Dressler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1963
- Gabel v. BirdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.