Legal Opinion
Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Heintz
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 2, 1985No. Nos. 84-1308, 84-1402PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises out of Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.’s (BG & E) suit against Frank 0. Heintz, William A. Badger, Lilo K. Schifter, Wayne B. Hamilton, and Haskell N. Arnold, the commissioners of the Maryland Public .Service Commission (PSC),1 seeking both a declaratory judgment that Md.Ann.Code art. 78 § 24(e) (1980) is unconstitutional and an injunction prohibiting the future enforcement of that section. BG & E is a public utility organized under Maryland law with its principal place of business in Baltimore City, Maryland. It primarily supplies gas and…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Mortimer v. Howard Research and Development Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Arizona Corp. Commission v. State Ex Rel. WoodsArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- American Rockwool, Inc. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1986
- United States v. DyerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.