McAninch v. McAninch
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
The judge was in error when he concluded that the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution of the United States deprived the North Carolina court of jurisdiction to consider plaintiff’s action for custody of his minor child. The almost identical question was decided in May v. Anderson, 345 U.S. 528 (1953). In May, the husband, wife and children lived in Wisconsin. Upon reaching a decision to separate, the wife took the children and moved to Ohio. The husband obtained a divorce and custody of the children in a Wisconsin proceeding. The only service of process upon the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- May v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Baker v. Baker, Eccles & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Spence v. DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Lennon v. LennonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Fleek v. FleekSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harris v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991