Legal Opinion · Dissent

Churchill v. The F/V Fjord

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 7, 1984No. 82-3644Published

1Dissent

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge, with whom BROWNING, Chief Judge, ANDERSON, TANG and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges,

join, dissenting.

I dissent from the majority’s holding that henceforward the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals will give no special consideration whatever to the decision of a district court on the state law of its home jurisdiction. The holding is not only a major departure from our own practice, but is contrary to all the reported decisions of the other circuits as well as the views of scholarly authorities on the question.

The result can only serve as a disincentive to our district courts to…

2Cases cited100 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API