Legal Opinion

Croker v. Sturgis

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1902PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to punish respondent for contempt in failing to reinstate the applicant, pursuant to peremptory writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

The respondent, as fire commissioner of the city of ¡New York, was directed by peremptory writ of mandamus to reinstate the relator in the office of chief of department. The writ was served on August twenty-ninth and on the same day,. about two hours afterward, the respondent caused an appeal 'to be taken from the order which granted the writ. When served with the writ, he stated that he intended to be governed by the advice of the corporation counsel and declined to carry out the direction for the reinstatement of the relator at the moment.

The present application is to punish the respondent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. New York Mail & Newspaper Transportation Co. v. SheaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. People ex rel. Standard Gaslight Co. v. DalyNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Ames v. JudsonNew York Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API