Legal Opinion
York v. York
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided May 10, 1985No. 84-236PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHastings, J.
This is an appeal from a holding by the district court that it had not acquired personal jurisdiction of respondent in a marriage dissolution case under the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-536 (Cum. Supp. 1984). We reverse and remand.
Petitioner, a resident of Scotts Bluff County for 38 years, brought this action for dissolution of marriage against her husband, the respondent. At the time this action was filed in October of 1983, respondent was, and since December of 1982 had been, absent from the state. He was served personally with summons in Fruitland, Idaho. Respondent neither answered…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wagner v. Unicord Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- McGowan Grain, Inc. v. SanburgNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Dunham v. Hunt Midwest Entertainment, Inc.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 1994
- Thomas Jackson Publishing, Inc. v. BucknerDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1985
- State, Department of Social Services ex rel. Yankton v. CummingsNebraska Court of Appeals · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.