Legal Opinion

Neal v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1960PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swepston

The plaintiff in error, Clyde Neal, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted for the unlawful possession of a quantity of intoxicating whisky. His punishment was fixed at a fine of $100 and 90 days’ confinement in *494the workhouse of Overton County. The defendant has appealed and assigned several errors.

The assignments raise 3 questions: (1) that there is no competent evidence on which a verdict of guilt could have been predicated, because the testimony of the officers is based solely upon an invalid search warrant; (2) the evidence preponderates against the correctness of the verdict and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wyman Hulan Parr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  2. Brubaker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
  3. Hood v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. RossTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. FowlerTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. BrownCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  4. Dukes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
  5. Miller v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API