Neal v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swepston
The plaintiff in error, Clyde Neal, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted for the unlawful possession of a quantity of intoxicating whisky. His punishment was fixed at a fine of $100 and 90 days’ confinement in *494the workhouse of Overton County. The defendant has appealed and assigned several errors.
The assignments raise 3 questions: (1) that there is no competent evidence on which a verdict of guilt could have been predicated, because the testimony of the officers is based solely upon an invalid search warrant; (2) the evidence preponderates against the correctness of the verdict and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wyman Hulan Parr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Brubaker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
- Hood v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. RossTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. FowlerTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. BrownCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
- Dukes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
- Miller v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.