Mulligan v. Murphy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentHalperx, J.
I am constrained to dissent from the decision about to be made. I believe that the petitioner was given the full benefit by the prison authorities of the provisions of chapter 473 of the Laws of 1960, repealing section 219 of the *226Correction Law and inserting a new section 219 in its place. The decision of the majority gives the petitioner an additional benefit which I believe has no sanction in a reasonable construction of the amendatory statute.
The petitioner was sentenced on April 18, 1949, to a term of 2 to 10 years. The petitioner was released on parole on May 16, 1950, owing 8 years, 6…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- New York & Oswego Midland Railroad v. Van HornNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Saltser & Weinsier, Inc. v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Waddey v. WaddeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- People ex rel. Zakowicki v. MorhousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954