Legal Opinion

State v. Tucker

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1903PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Writ of error and supersedeas to Circuit Court, Wood County. Action by State of West Virginia against Thomas Tucker. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

McWHORTER, PRESIDENT:

Thomas Tucker was convicted in the criminal court of Wood County upon indictment for the murder of Mary Beall, alias Mary Bell, alias Mary Ilelmick, on the-day of January, 1902. Defendant applied to the circuit court of Wood County for a writ of error, which was refused on the 16th day of May, 1902. He then applied to, and obtained from one of the judges of this Court, a writ of error and supersedeas to the execution of the judgment rendered by the said criminal court. In the course of the trial the defendant, by counsel, took seven separate bills *422of exceptions to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. State v. WelchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Commonwealth v. JonesGeneral Court of Virginia · 1829
  4. State v. BakerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. State v. AllenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. HamricWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. McMillionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. State v. BowlesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State v. ReppertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Normile v. Wheeling Traction Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API