Legal Opinion

Beatty v. Lamont

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided February 27, 2024No. 3:22-cv-00380Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT TERESA BEATTY et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 3:22-cv-00380 (JAM) MICHELLE GILMAN et al., Defendants. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS Does requiring a convicted prisoner to pay for their costs of imprisonment violate the prisoner’s right to be free from an excessive fine under the Eighth Amendment? That is the main question in this case. The case involves Connecticut’s “pay-to-stay” law—a law that allows the State of Connecticut to seek reimbursement from convicted state prisoners for the costs of their…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API